| 1 |
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 21:41 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> > On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 12:54:04AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> >>Currently there are quite a few ebuilds in the tree that execute dodoc |
| 5 |
> >>or dohtml for files that do not exist. I think it would be nice to have |
| 6 |
> >>ebuilds die if this is the case. To not break current ebuilds this would |
| 7 |
> >>only happen with FEATURES="stricter". This is what I currently do in my |
| 8 |
> >>bashrc. Obviously when integreted to portage one can use helper |
| 9 |
> >>functions like hasq which are not available in bashrc. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Well some people opposed this idea so what do everyone think about |
| 14 |
> making portage output stuff like this to a qa-warnings (or whatever) |
| 15 |
> file that developers can use? This would have the added benefit that |
| 16 |
> users would not normally see this stuff and report stuff so easily but |
| 17 |
> developers would still have easy access to it. Portage could even output |
| 18 |
> a header to this file saying not to file bug reports unless you know |
| 19 |
> what you are doing? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I see the point about not showing all the QA stuff to the 'regluar' |
| 22 |
user. Maybe only show this info on screen with --verbose set. As for |
| 23 |
the QA-warnings file, how does this differ from parsing the files in |
| 24 |
PORTLOG_DIR? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Later Days, |
| 27 |
-Lares |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Lares Moreau <lares.moreau@×××××.com> | LRU: 400755 http://counter.li.org |
| 31 |
lares/irc.freenode.net | |
| 32 |
Gentoo x86 Arch Tester | ::0 Alberta, Canada |
| 33 |
Public Key: 0D46BB6E @ subkeys.pgp.net | Encrypted Mail Preferred |
| 34 |
Key fingerprint = 0CA3 E40D F897 7709 3628 C5D4 7D94 483E 0D46 BB6E |
Archives