Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 20:13:08
Message-Id: 20070506210618.0517c76c@snowflake
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer
1 On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:00:56 -0400
2 Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
3 > > Er, making elog logged by default would not solve the "requires an
4 > > explicit read" problem. Making elog require an explicit read would
5 > > be far too annoying because most elog notices are noise. We've been
6 > > over this already.
7 >
8 > Not if one filters it properly. ELOG_CLASSES="warn error" sounds
9 > like a sane default to me.
10
11 So you want users to have to explicitly acknowledge all ewarn notices?
12 Now *that*'s a way of making the system useless by overusing it.
13
14 --
15 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>