From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | ||
Date: | Sun, 06 May 2007 20:13:08 | ||
Message-Id: | 20070506210618.0517c76c@snowflake | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade by Dan Meltzer |
1 | On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:00:56 -0400 |
2 | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 | > > Er, making elog logged by default would not solve the "requires an |
4 | > > explicit read" problem. Making elog require an explicit read would |
5 | > > be far too annoying because most elog notices are noise. We've been |
6 | > > over this already. |
7 | > |
8 | > Not if one filters it properly. ELOG_CLASSES="warn error" sounds |
9 | > like a sane default to me. |
10 | |
11 | So you want users to have to explicitly acknowledge all ewarn notices? |
12 | Now *that*'s a way of making the system useless by overusing it. |
13 | |
14 | -- |
15 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 news item for review: Radiant upgrade | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> |