Archives
Archives
| From: | Dan Douglas <ormaaj@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: the demise of grub:0 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:04:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | CADVxHgMijqn=DUJ2waf1wsYC3693tbTSB+pKpCyXjTHN3+kYYw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] rfc: the demise of grub:0 by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | I'm not against removing grub1, but why are the only versions of grub |
| 2 | in the tree betas? They don't have a proper release cycle? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Also grub2-mkconfig is disgusting. I wonder if anybody is interested |
| 5 | in making something better because I doubt it would be much work for |
| 6 | someone that knows grub well. 90% of what it does is generate |
| 7 | boilerplate code that few people understand. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: the demise of grub:0 | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: the demise of grub:0 | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |