Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Swift@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:46:57
Message-Id: 438367AF.1070107@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Re: Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation by Jakub Moc
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Jakub Moc schrieb:
5 | 22.11.2005, 19:13:36, Danny van Dyk wrote:
6 |
7 |
8 |>Thomas Kirchner schrieb: | I'm against this change, personally.
9 Stage1 has
10 |>*always* been for | advanced users. If someone screws up their own system
11 |>(which is possible | in any number of other ways, as well) then it's their
12 |>fault. Gentoo | isn't about babying users. It is about choice. And if
13 |>changing that is | the only way to reduce your workload, well...
14 |
15 |
16 |>In which way do we take away your ability to choose by moving
17 |>documentation from one place to another one? It's just the aim to not
18 |>include this documentation into the handbook (which ends up on the
19 |>installcds) and to move it out of the scope of ricers.
20 |
21 |
22 | If you look at http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/faq.xml (How do I Install
23 Gentoo
24 | Using a Stage1 or Stage2 Tarball?) I'd not exactly say that the
25 documentations
26 | has been *moved*. Compare that with the original handbook.
27 That's currently a stub. If i recall right, Swift mentioned on #-dev
28 that he'd need to refurbish this.
29 Swift: Right?
30
31 Danny
32 - --
33 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
34 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
35 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
37
38 iD8DBQFDg2evaVNL8NrtU6IRAqH9AJ9JtN58oKu80O2QPLnbWezZbJte9wCdFKBG
39 WDdFjRu2HBZF0tYswBp2v6g=
40 =QcNK
41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
42 --
43 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies