| 1 |
On 22/06/27 10:59AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 11:24 PM Jeff Gazso <jeff.gazso@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > My thought is unless some serious deficiency is present in |
| 4 |
> > app-office/sc-im it should be moved to Gentoo's main ebuild repository |
| 5 |
> > and the last rites process should be started for app-office/sc. Does |
| 6 |
> > anyone else have thoughts or comments on this? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> We could probably last rite app-office/sc. It has no maintainer, and a |
| 9 |
> couple of open bugs. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Moving app-office/sc-im to the Gentoo repo is a bit more of an ask. |
| 12 |
> Ideally, a Gentoo developer would maintain it. Alternatively, a |
| 13 |
> non-developer could maintain it by proxy, but you would need to find a |
| 14 |
> developer to act as proxy or get approval from the Proxy Maintainers |
| 15 |
> project. In any case, you should probably reach out to the current |
| 16 |
> maintainer in GURU to see what he wants to do. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm the maintainer of app-office/sc-im. Just so everyone is aware, upon |
| 20 |
talking to Jeff, I've decided to maintain it by proxy. I have some reading |
| 21 |
to do but hopefully I'll have created the necessary pull requests by |
| 22 |
tomorrow. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I do have just one question: Should I wait until the pull requests are |
| 25 |
merged to remove sc-im from GURU or should I do it after I create the pull |
| 26 |
requests? |
Archives