| 1 |
Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
> Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
>> I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still uses it. |
| 5 |
>> Need to fix that up before masking it. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> I'll have a look. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Okay, x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r3 was added to the tree which fixed the |
| 10 |
virtual/x11 and GCC 4.1 compile issues. It was marked stable on all |
| 11 |
archs except alpha. Someone doing some cleanup accidentally removed it |
| 12 |
from the tree instead of the broken -r2. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
We could restore -r3, but considering nothing in the tree depends on |
| 15 |
1.2.6 and the number of months gone by without anyone even noticing -r2 |
| 16 |
doesn't build, I think it might be better to just remove it along with |
| 17 |
virtual/x11. fox fell into treecleaner territory until recently but it |
| 18 |
looks like mabi has taken over as maintainer, so it's up to him. ;) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
where to now? if i had to guess |
| 23 |
dirtyepic gentoo org i'm afraid to say antarctica's next |
| 24 |
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives