1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:03 pm, Alec Warner wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>Mike Frysinger wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>>On Thursday 20 October 2005 05:47 pm, Petteri Räty wrote: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>>>Every once in a while I see people wanting to use nosomething use flags. |
9 |
>>>>Why don't we have a package.use like we already have a package.mask |
10 |
>>>>file? This would make it possible for developers to turn on use flags by |
11 |
>>>>default in a way that would not cruft the base profiles for every local |
12 |
>>>>use flag. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>>i still dont see how this addresses the nocxx / USE=-* |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>>noFOO is used because "FOO" is on by default, and noFOO turns it off. |
17 |
>>AutoUSE is the same way, package bar is included in the buildplan and to |
18 |
>>have sane defaults, certain flags are turned on. |
19 |
>><snip> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> |
22 |
> that was a great explanation however irrelevant it may have been |
23 |
> |
24 |
> i guess we will have to make 'nocxx' a special case as we strip all other |
25 |
> 'no*' USE flags from portage |
26 |
> -mike |
27 |
> |
28 |
|
29 |
And we should keep the current shitty behavior to accomediate cxx why? |
30 |
What is so hard about USE="-* cxx"? Are there no other flags that do |
31 |
bad things when they aren't turned on via use.defaults and profiles? |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |