Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:50:23
Message-Id: 435856DB.4080206@egr.msu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:03 pm, Alec Warner wrote:
3 >
4 >>Mike Frysinger wrote:
5 >>
6 >>>On Thursday 20 October 2005 05:47 pm, Petteri Räty wrote:
7 >>>
8 >>>>Every once in a while I see people wanting to use nosomething use flags.
9 >>>>Why don't we have a package.use like we already have a package.mask
10 >>>>file? This would make it possible for developers to turn on use flags by
11 >>>>default in a way that would not cruft the base profiles for every local
12 >>>>use flag.
13 >>>
14 >>>i still dont see how this addresses the nocxx / USE=-*
15 >>
16 >>noFOO is used because "FOO" is on by default, and noFOO turns it off.
17 >>AutoUSE is the same way, package bar is included in the buildplan and to
18 >>have sane defaults, certain flags are turned on.
19 >><snip>
20 >
21 >
22 > that was a great explanation however irrelevant it may have been
23 >
24 > i guess we will have to make 'nocxx' a special case as we strip all other
25 > 'no*' USE flags from portage
26 > -mike
27 >
28
29 And we should keep the current shitty behavior to accomediate cxx why?
30 What is so hard about USE="-* cxx"? Are there no other flags that do
31 bad things when they aren't turned on via use.defaults and profiles?
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>