| 1 |
On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:03 pm, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thursday 20 October 2005 05:47 pm, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
> >>Every once in a while I see people wanting to use nosomething use flags. |
| 5 |
> >>Why don't we have a package.use like we already have a package.mask |
| 6 |
> >>file? This would make it possible for developers to turn on use flags by |
| 7 |
> >>default in a way that would not cruft the base profiles for every local |
| 8 |
> >>use flag. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > i still dont see how this addresses the nocxx / USE=-* |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> noFOO is used because "FOO" is on by default, and noFOO turns it off. |
| 13 |
> AutoUSE is the same way, package bar is included in the buildplan and to |
| 14 |
> have sane defaults, certain flags are turned on. |
| 15 |
> <snip> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
that was a great explanation however irrelevant it may have been |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
i guess we will have to make 'nocxx' a special case as we strip all other |
| 20 |
'no*' USE flags from portage |
| 21 |
-mike |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives