1 |
On 2/8/16 10:09 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> |
4 |
>> what does in-house tool mean? i'm a gentoo developer but i also work |
5 |
>> on an upstream project (eudev) that 14 distros use. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> some of the criticism given here are my concerns as well and i've |
8 |
>> spoken with the various distros --- slack, parted magic, puppy. they |
9 |
>> get what's going on and they still see eudev is the best way forward |
10 |
>> for now. it may not be in the future, but neither will a udev |
11 |
>> extracted from a compiled full systemd codebase. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> How many of those 14 distros have more than 14 users? |
14 |
|
15 |
may i forward that to them? i'm sure they'll appreciate your comment. |
16 |
|
17 |
anyhow, your rhetorical question has speculation as its basis. do you |
18 |
have numbers of users? as i write this, gentoo is number 44 in |
19 |
distrowatch.com below slackware at 22 and puppy at 15. can you produce |
20 |
reliable numbers? |
21 |
|
22 |
gentoo is very unpopular as a distro. however, it excels as a meta |
23 |
distro. if you marginalize its special features, you take away all its |
24 |
charm. |
25 |
|
26 |
> |
27 |
> Look, I get it, some people don't like systemd. That's fine. |
28 |
> However, you have to realize at this point that a non-systemd |
29 |
> configuration is anything but mainstream. |
30 |
|
31 |
neither is a system based on musl or uclibc, but if you need an embedded |
32 |
system, then these are "mainstream". |
33 |
|
34 |
similarly hardened is not "mainstream" and yet there are many companies |
35 |
that depend on it. |
36 |
|
37 |
the notion of "mainstream" is relative and you're taking a particular |
38 |
vantage point. |
39 |
|
40 |
anyhow, the argument in the subject is the order of udev and eudev in |
41 |
the virtual, not systemd vs eudev. |
42 |
|
43 |
There will always be a |
44 |
> "poppyseed linux" whose purpose in life seems to be to preserve linux |
45 |
> without sysfs or some other obscure practice. |
46 |
|
47 |
no, more like special uses. you're framing the issue based on your |
48 |
notion of "mainstream" |
49 |
|
50 |
I just think that |
51 |
> Gentoo should offer the choice to do those things, but have a more |
52 |
> mainstream set of defaults. |
53 |
|
54 |
i don't care about the order of the virtual, that was other people's |
55 |
issues. i'm responding to bad arguments. |
56 |
|
57 |
> |
58 |
>> |
59 |
>> it needs to be in the new stage4s to make a bootable system. imo a |
60 |
>> stage4 should be bootable modulo a kernel. |
61 |
>> |
62 |
> |
63 |
> Sure, a stage4 based on systemd makes a lot of sense. |
64 |
|
65 |
not for embedded and the things i work on. these have users. |
66 |
|
67 |
> |
68 |
> I think that offering an eudev-based distro as a default just doesn't |
69 |
> make sense in 2016. |
70 |
|
71 |
because you have a limited sense of usefulness |
72 |
|
73 |
> |
74 |
> When these sorts of debates come up it seems like: |
75 |
> 1. People express their preference. |
76 |
|
77 |
no, its not a preference. its the right tool for the right job. when |
78 |
something needs systemd, you use that, when something needs eudev you |
79 |
use that. |
80 |
|
81 |
> 2. People get offended when others express a different preference. |
82 |
|
83 |
all the vitriolic attacks i get about eudev come from the gentoo |
84 |
community. outside of this community i get praise. |
85 |
|
86 |
> 3. People say "it's just a default" as if that is a reason that |
87 |
> others shouldn't object to their own preference. |
88 |
|
89 |
the arguments based on "preference" and "mainstream" are fallacious. |
90 |
|
91 |
|
92 |
-- |
93 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
94 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
95 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
96 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
97 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |