Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:46:29
Message-Id: 20040622194343.0b161423@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem by Aron Griffis
1 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:12:04 -0400 Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | Actually, that isn't true. It was established previously that the
4 | order of keywords would indicate the order in which they were added to
5 | an ebuild. This was agreed upon about a year ago (I recall that
6 | drobbins took part in the discussion). Ekeyword adheres to that
7 | established precedent, which means that presently there should be a
8 | lot of ebuilds that contain the maintainer's arch first in the list.
9
10 ..which would be fine if packages had a single consistent maintainer who
11 used one single arch.
12
13 --
14 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox)
15 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
16 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies