| 1 |
Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:53:32 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Luis Francisco Araujo <araujo@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> I thought of that while I was walking to a meeting..heh Basically, |
| 7 |
>>> Appoint two people to co-lead, or appoint one Lead and one Vice |
| 8 |
>>> Lead. That way there's some kind of accountability on the bare |
| 9 |
>>> minimum level and good coverage (hopefully). |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>> I was also thinking about turning the Council into a Leaders Group , |
| 12 |
>> or probably to create a new Core Team. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> [snip] |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Before everyone start posting "solutions" please *clearly* define the |
| 17 |
> perceived problem first, otherwise all attempts to fix it are futile. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Gentoo current state of stagnation. |
| 21 |
(re-read some posting of this thread, the first one made by Donnie mainly) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> PS: is it really already time again for the annual Gentoo restructuring |
| 24 |
> debate? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
That's what happens when you 'try' to evade the real problems. They will |
| 28 |
get back, stronger than ever every time. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Luis F. Araujo "araujo at gentoo.org" |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives