| 1 |
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:21:15 -0500 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > The only (QA) problem I see is the pointless removal of the ebuild |
| 8 |
> > in question and the subsequent addition of a pointless revision |
| 9 |
> > bump with no clue as to why it was removed or why the revision bump |
| 10 |
> > was required: |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> You'd probably do well to read: |
| 14 |
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_hands |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> The TL;DR of that is "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw |
| 17 |
> stones." |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I get that you're probably not being serious, but if for some reason |
| 20 |
> you are I'd suggest letting somebody else in QA handle it. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> And, really, next time just talk to somebody before you go bumping |
| 23 |
> their ebuilds. If they're not cooperative then you'll garner a lot |
| 24 |
> more sympathy. This is staff quiz kind of stuff. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I have no idea why you're telling me all that. I don't normally quote |
| 27 |
excessive context but in this case I really don't see how my text and |
| 28 |
your text connect. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
jer |
Archives