| 1 |
Grant Goodyear wrote: [Tue Sep 13 2005, 11:40:43AM CDT] |
| 2 |
> I'm not sure that's entirely correct. I seem to remember at least one |
| 3 |
> devrel dev stating that when it comes to devs who violate technical |
| 4 |
> policies (not using repoman, repeatedly breaking sections of the tree, |
| 5 |
> etcetera) that enforcement should be left up to the appropriate |
| 6 |
> managers, not devrel. The argument was that devrel devs are often not |
| 7 |
> experts in the technical aspects, so it's hard for them to adjudicate |
| 8 |
> effectively. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I should also mention that I'm not advocating this interpretation. I'd |
| 11 |
much prefer that devrel's scope encompass such technical issues. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-g2boojum- |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Grant Goodyear |
| 16 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 17 |
g2boojum@g.o |
| 18 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
| 19 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |
Archives