| 1 |
Acctually I think this should work. I'm not really interested with |
| 2 |
updates anyways. The computer (like most real embedded devices) will |
| 3 |
not be connected to the outside world, so no security risks and need to |
| 4 |
upgrade without doing a complete overhaul. I just need something stable |
| 5 |
that works. I just have to see how it will behave with my RT kernel. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 01:10, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 8 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 9 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> On Tuesday 28 October 2003 03:30, Dejan Nikic wrote: |
| 12 |
> > hmm that's too bad. I wish there is some way of acctually chrooting |
| 13 |
> > into a portage-less system, but still be able to compile everything |
| 14 |
> > from scratch using the flags and such. Otherwise I'll have to go LFS |
| 15 |
> > way, and I'd really hate to do that, since I really don't have that |
| 16 |
> > much time on my hands. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> You could bind mount the portage tree into the root system (of course |
| 19 |
> updates will be out of the question). After you're done unmerge portage |
| 20 |
> and it works. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Paul |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> - -- |
| 25 |
> Paul de Vrieze |
| 26 |
> Gentoo Developer |
| 27 |
> Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 28 |
> Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 29 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> iD8DBQE/njJwbKx5DBjWFdsRAiS8AKCpP1mRGgGsWUh5jhsUf/669IucfACeP0HX |
| 33 |
> XeoSxlZM0kfGqRGu+MA9yOs= |
| 34 |
> =K6ne |
| 35 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> -- |
| 39 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives