| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 03:30, Dejan Nikic wrote: |
| 5 |
> hmm that's too bad. I wish there is some way of acctually chrooting |
| 6 |
> into a portage-less system, but still be able to compile everything |
| 7 |
> from scratch using the flags and such. Otherwise I'll have to go LFS |
| 8 |
> way, and I'd really hate to do that, since I really don't have that |
| 9 |
> much time on my hands. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
You could bind mount the portage tree into the root system (of course |
| 12 |
updates will be out of the question). After you're done unmerge portage |
| 13 |
and it works. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Paul |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 19 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 20 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 21 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iD8DBQE/njJwbKx5DBjWFdsRAiS8AKCpP1mRGgGsWUh5jhsUf/669IucfACeP0HX |
| 26 |
XeoSxlZM0kfGqRGu+MA9yOs= |
| 27 |
=K6ne |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives