| 1 |
Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>19.11.2005, 0:58:29, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>My preference is that the subdomain chosen should succinctly reflect the role |
| 8 |
>>that arch testers serve. My personal preference would be to choose something |
| 9 |
>>like "aide", "helper", "assistant", or something similar. (Indeed, I'd have |
| 10 |
>>preferred "volunteer" if it weren't for the niggling fact that we're all |
| 11 |
>>volunteers.) |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>>-g2boojum- |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>Once again - I don't know if it's not been clear enough so far, from the |
| 22 |
>replies on this topic: I don't have time nor desire to dig out somewhere on the |
| 23 |
>web what's the correct email I should use to contact someone... there are about |
| 24 |
>200 more or less active Gentoo devs around and the last thing I need is to |
| 25 |
>ponder upon what project/role that particular person is on. What's the benefit? |
| 26 |
>:/ |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
>Please, don't introduce such PITA. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
What is the problem of giving them @g.o addresses? |
| 34 |
Why exactly do we need the distinction? (sorry, i can't see any benefit |
| 35 |
but more confusion). |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives