1 |
On Tue, May 19, 2009 23:42, Robert Buchholz wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 19 May 2009, Jesús Guerrero wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 21:52, Dale wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> Also, the link to your thread does not exist. I get "The topic or |
7 |
>>> post you requested does not exist". |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> The project should be viewable. The forum post will only be |
10 |
>> visible for mods, admins and devs I guess, and only when loged in· |
11 |
>> There's nothing I can do about that. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I get the same error (logged in). I don't know why it is restricted, but |
15 |
> since you announced the thread as containing the rationale for the project, |
16 |
> it was rather hard to follow the reasons. Thanks for stating them in the |
17 |
> mail I am replying to. |
18 |
|
19 |
I don't know what the problem is with the forum thread, but it's |
20 |
there, I swear :) Anyway you are welcome. If you have questions |
21 |
just ask. That's what the RFC is for after all. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
> Do we need this to be a top-level project? I imagine this might live as |
25 |
> a sub-project of the Forums TLP. |
26 |
|
27 |
No idea. I am new to this whole project thing. I guess that the |
28 |
correct question to ask is whether the forum project team cares at |
29 |
all about this (I guess the answer would be no, at least not as a |
30 |
project, though some individuals might care). |
31 |
|
32 |
With that in mind I doubt they will be willing to have yet another |
33 |
thing to worry about. But I can't speak on behalf of them of |
34 |
course. |
35 |
|
36 |
I really don't care if this is a top level project or a subproject. |
37 |
So, what do people think about this? |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
By the way, thanks for the comments. :) |
41 |
-- |
42 |
Jesús Guerrero |