1 |
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:30:40 PM Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
4 |
> > Hash: SHA256 |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: |
7 |
> >> I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable |
8 |
> >> makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with |
9 |
> >> bug/security fixes is released. |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> >> Isn't our current rate of stabilization "selling" a promise of |
12 |
> >> stability we can't stand behind? |
13 |
> >> |
14 |
> >> Mike |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Well to be perfectly honest, the current-stable 3.16 and 3.17 kernels |
17 |
> > for me at least have some rather unfortunate regressions over 3.15 and |
18 |
> > previous, so even with the stabilization we're achieving now I don't |
19 |
> > think we're living up to our "promise of stability" :) |
20 |
> |
21 |
> As a btrfs user I went through quite a bit of pain in the whole |
22 |
> 3.15-17 series, but I that probably isn't a typical mainstream user |
23 |
> experience. This sort of thing was why I did suggest targeting |
24 |
> longterm. When the next longterm is announced then we could |
25 |
> transition to it at our leisure (ie with plenty of testing while |
26 |
> following point releases quickly on the previous longterm). |
27 |
> |
28 |
> So, moving between longterm branches would have a more typical Gentoo |
29 |
> QA process. However, between point releases within a branch we would |
30 |
> auto-stable releases, since it is unlikely that our own QA process is |
31 |
> going to add any real value beyond what upstream already does. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> We also need to keep in mind just what our "promise of stability" even |
34 |
> means. We're not a release-based distro, and we're NEVER going to |
35 |
> offer an experience like RHEL or Debian Stable where the entirety of |
36 |
> the package base is pinned and tested and we only do security |
37 |
> backports. The kernel stable branches probably represent a lot more |
38 |
> stability than we have almost anywhere else in the distro anyway. |
39 |
|
40 |
We have had a lot of stable kernels with a not-so-stable btrfs. That's a |
41 |
whole conversation in itself. There are pieces of the kernel that are in a, |
42 |
shall we say, less stable state than others. |
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
Mike Pagano |
46 |
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project |
47 |
Team Lead - Gentoo Sources |
48 |
E-Mail : mpagano@g.o |
49 |
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 |
50 |
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3&op=index |