1 |
On Wed, 2006-07-06 at 18:41 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: |
2 |
> Arek (James Potts) wrote: |
3 |
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
4 |
> >>> >=virtual/x11-7 is hiding breakage in ebuilds that are not ported for |
5 |
> >>> modular X. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> >> I couldn't agree more, but I was forced to add this rather than allow |
8 |
> >> unported ebuilds to break. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > Hmmm...Looks to me like it would be a great idea to fix the unported |
11 |
> > ebuilds. Would it be possible to mark virtual/x11-7 as deprecated |
12 |
> > (using enotice/ewarn or similar), in order to get people to port any |
13 |
> > build relying on it to modular X? |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > The way I see it, once virtual/x11-7 has been deprecated for a while (6 |
16 |
> > months to a year) and most popular packages have been ported to modular |
17 |
> > X, virtual/x11-7 and any packages still relying on it could be given |
18 |
> > Last Rites. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Hmm, I don't think so... There's been a plenty of time to do this when |
21 |
> modular X has been package.masked, the remaining unported stuff didn't |
22 |
> get much further even after it's been unmasked. There's been a |
23 |
> (debatable) repoman check, which has been too annoying so devs nuked it |
24 |
> for themselves, now it's non-fatal warning again (which is mostly being |
25 |
> ignored). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Soooo - I'd pretty much say until the real breakage is *visible* and |
28 |
> users start to scream - not much will change. Making it visible could |
29 |
> also help us differentiate between used and used stuff. If there's |
30 |
> something unported and you get no bug, then probably noone uses the |
31 |
> thing, nothing depends on it and it can be punted from the tree. |
32 |
|
33 |
Is there a recent list of non-ported packages ? Maybe we should do a |
34 |
last effort to port everything for a week or two and then package.mask |
35 |
the packages that no one cares enough about to port them. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Olivier Crête |
39 |
tester@g.o |
40 |
Gentoo Developer |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |