| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>>> But so far, not many people have been particularly interested in |
| 7 |
>>>> the details of these things. I'm also not sure if the ML is the |
| 8 |
>>>> right way to figure out these details. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Another issue, should we require "Signed-off-by:" lines? At least for |
| 11 |
> things that are contributed by users? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> We could just use the same rules for it as outlined in Linux |
| 14 |
> documentation (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches, especially |
| 15 |
> "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1"). |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks for bringing this up. I had circulated the start of a proposal |
| 19 |
on this a year ago: |
| 20 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~rich0/copyrightpolicy.xml |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
We didn't really take it further, but instituting just the DCO |
| 23 |
component of this policy using git signed-off-by lines should be |
| 24 |
fairly non-controversial. The FLA probably needs some review/etc but |
| 25 |
the intent was for that to be optional. The DCO is based on the linux |
| 26 |
DCO. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Rich |
Archives