1 |
On 03/17/04 Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 11:38, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
4 |
> > Thus the GLEP. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> FYI: |
7 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0024.html |
8 |
|
9 |
My opinion: I'm for a common prefix, but I don't like the gentoo- part. |
10 |
Reason: I don't think a gentoo- prefix would benefit so much if we |
11 |
already have a common config- and update- prefix, it just looks silly to |
12 |
me. Even in your specification you omit the gentoo- prefix for easier |
13 |
reading. It just makes the names longer, it doesn't help one bit with |
14 |
tab completion and it makes stuff gentoo specific, where do we draw a |
15 |
line between Gentoo specific tools and tools from packages that |
16 |
originated from Gentoo (portage being the big one here), should we |
17 |
rename emerge to gentoo-emerge? Maybe it makes some (IMO very limited) |
18 |
sense for new users, but for experienced users it's just more typing. |
19 |
|
20 |
Marius |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
24 |
|
25 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
26 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |