Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: consistent Gentoo tool names
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:42:57
Message-Id: 20040318094238.586b6771@sven.genone.homeip.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: consistent Gentoo tool names by Donnie Berkholz
1 On 03/17/04 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
2
3 > On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 11:38, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
4 > > Thus the GLEP.
5 >
6 > FYI:
7 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0024.html
8
9 My opinion: I'm for a common prefix, but I don't like the gentoo- part.
10 Reason: I don't think a gentoo- prefix would benefit so much if we
11 already have a common config- and update- prefix, it just looks silly to
12 me. Even in your specification you omit the gentoo- prefix for easier
13 reading. It just makes the names longer, it doesn't help one bit with
14 tab completion and it makes stuff gentoo specific, where do we draw a
15 line between Gentoo specific tools and tools from packages that
16 originated from Gentoo (portage being the big one here), should we
17 rename emerge to gentoo-emerge? Maybe it makes some (IMO very limited)
18 sense for new users, but for experienced users it's just more typing.
19
20 Marius
21
22 --
23 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
24
25 In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
26 Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: consistent Gentoo tool names John Nilsson <john@×××××××.nu>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: consistent Gentoo tool names Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>