1 |
On 01/02/2013 13:07, Michael Weber wrote: |
2 |
> Making up new situations up like cross-dev, Gentoo/Prefix, or jet |
3 |
> another cluttered C compiler should not doom working software. |
4 |
|
5 |
Which would be all fine and dandy .... |
6 |
|
7 |
> I agree on your testing effort and practice, but compliance with the |
8 |
> weirdest of all setups shouldn't be ultimate reason. |
9 |
|
10 |
... if you had a clue on what you were saying. |
11 |
|
12 |
The tinderbox _by design_ is not testing "weirdest of all setups", it's |
13 |
testing baseline. And if nobody's interested in getting (example) |
14 |
media-video/w3cam working (#247917 — last activity on the bug by me on |
15 |
2010; last activity by someone else in 2008!), I don't see why it should |
16 |
be kept in tree. |
17 |
|
18 |
Bloody hell, I wonder how many people complaining about removing |
19 |
packages are actually using said packages, rather that complaining on |
20 |
principles! |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
24 |
flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |