| 1 |
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> The last time we seriously tested svn we found that svn choked on a |
| 4 |
> repository the size of the portage tree. The problem w/ arch (and w/ |
| 5 |
> metacvs, which would be my preference), is that neither system has a |
| 6 |
> good migration utility from cvs. The history of changes that is kept in |
| 7 |
> our cvs tree is extremely valuable, and thus any new system that does |
| 8 |
> not allow us to keep that history is a non-starter. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
arch has cscvs to migrate the full history stored in a CVS archive to |
| 11 |
an arch (changeset-based) archive. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Cheers, |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Dr. Denys Duchier |
| 17 |
Équipe Calligramme |
| 18 |
LORIA, Nancy, FRANCE |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives