| 1 |
On 03/31/2012 01:06 PM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 10:52:53AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300 |
| 4 |
>> Alex Alexander<alex.alexander@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> @preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it |
| 6 |
>>> should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production |
| 7 |
>>> boxes for years without any issues :) |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> ...and here we see the problem. You think that "I haven't noticed it |
| 10 |
>> break" means "it works". |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> The problem with preserved-libs (and emerge --jobs, for that matter) is |
| 13 |
>> that the design is "I can think of a few ways where it might break, so |
| 14 |
>> I'll hard-code in special cases to handle those, but in general I |
| 15 |
>> can't think of what other problems there are so it's fine". That's a |
| 16 |
>> bad way of doing things. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Then don't use it. Reality is, gentoo does. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> If you don't like that fact, I suggest you stick to exherbo. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Related, why the hell are you still even around here? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> You literally send more mail to our dev ml then to exherbos. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I wouldn't care if it weren't the fact your gentoo dev posts |
| 27 |
> generally consist of "xyz is stupid, as is the people behind it" |
| 28 |
> whether it be portage, udev, council, etc, take your pick. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> ~harring (being rather tired of the broken record). |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
separate gentoo-dev@ and gentoo-dev-public@ MLs so we would have a place |
| 34 |
where to discuss about improving Gentoo with people who also want to |
| 35 |
improve it |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
(or hand me powers to remove people from ML :-) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
- Samuli |
Archives