| 1 |
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Good idea, we really could use some kind of kernel seeds in the Portage |
| 4 |
> tree; if someone is willing to maintain them, knowing that Pappy has |
| 5 |
> maintained them for years and spoke about it it seems like hard work. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Remember that these "kernel seeds" are actually pretty far from what we |
| 8 |
need for genkernel defaults (at least the way we currently recommend using |
| 9 |
it in our install handbook). The kernel seeds provide a good sane kernel |
| 10 |
config *with little or no specific hardware support*. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
But I'm definitely in favor of separately packaging the kernel configs. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-Ben |
Archives