| 1 |
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 06:57:42PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi everyone, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'm working on the (final) depend.eclass version selection routine. I should |
| 5 |
> finish it today and then I'll move on to writing ebuilds for kde3-beta1 and |
| 6 |
> later kde3 cvs[up], which I'll put on some site for people like e.g. woodchip |
| 7 |
> (who is working on this too from some angle) et al to use/test. So when we |
| 8 |
> come to kde3 final we'll have long-used, well-tested ebuilds right away :-) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> A few Qs: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> 1. If the FHS say only binary stuff goes in /opt, where would I put several |
| 13 |
> KDEs-in-testing? /usr/kde-$ver? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Whatever makes sense; just don't use /opt. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> 2. Where should I put these ebuilds (as patches to portage)? I curently have |
| 18 |
> no personal site; I could use sourceforge or something similar, but a |
| 19 |
> collection of packages for a distribution doesn't really seem to fit |
| 20 |
> sourceforge's purposes (marginally). Maybe we should just put them on |
| 21 |
> gentoo.org somewhere? After all, they won't be at all large. Or just do cvs |
| 22 |
> branches :-) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Can you just put them on Portage and add them to package.mask? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
| 28 |
Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org |
| 29 |
Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
Archives