1 |
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 00:34 +0000, likewhoa wrote: |
2 |
> > > Do you think commercial packages should be part of the main tree? |
3 |
> > > > Yes |
4 |
> > > > No |
5 |
> > > > Why not |
6 |
> > > > Never! |
7 |
> > > > in unofficial overlay |
8 |
> > > > Dunno |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Is this something that we really even want to ask? I mean, if we're all |
11 |
> > about trying to provide the best user experience, then binary packages |
12 |
> > are almost a requirement, especially with binary packages that were |
13 |
> > originally targeted at specific binary distributions. I tend to see |
14 |
> > this as one of those "religious" issues that is best left alone, like |
15 |
> > emacs versus vi. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Yea commercial packages should maybe be part of overlays.gentoo.org so |
18 |
> that the tree can stay clean from these types of packages. But I agree |
19 |
> if it's decided not to included in the user survey. |
20 |
|
21 |
I look at it very differently. One of the main advantages to Gentoo is |
22 |
being source-based. This allows us to ship "packages" in our repository |
23 |
for binary and commercial packages that would otherwise be impossible in |
24 |
a binary distribution. Remember, we don't actually ship the commercial |
25 |
software. We ship a bash script (essentially) that tells how to install |
26 |
the software. As much as I like to appeal to zealots (hahaha, right), I |
27 |
don't consider shipping a bash script telling how to install a product |
28 |
to be *anything* like shipping said product, endorsing it, or anything |
29 |
else license zealots will try to spout to justify the removal of GPL-2 |
30 |
code from our repository. |
31 |
|
32 |
Many people don't consider overlays, even Gentoo-run ones, to be of |
33 |
sufficient quality/support/whatever to be used on production systems. |
34 |
These are the same systems and people that would most likely utilize |
35 |
these commercial ebuilds. |
36 |
|
37 |
Basically, it is removing the *option* to install these packages from |
38 |
the people who would like to use them for the sake of the people who |
39 |
*REFUSE* to use the packages and insist on their removal from the tree |
40 |
simply because they don't like the license under which is was released. |
41 |
I'm sorry, but if that's not against the idea of a free and open |
42 |
community, I don't know what is. |
43 |
|
44 |
You have the right to chose what licenses you wish to support and use |
45 |
software which agrees with your ideals, but that doesn't give you the |
46 |
right to *DENY* others to do the same. |
47 |
|
48 |
Sorry, I just don't see it as a valid question, at all. |
49 |
|
50 |
> > > Do you like the Gentoo Linux Installer (GLI)? |
51 |
> > > > Yes |
52 |
> > > > No |
53 |
> > > > Never heard of it |
54 |
> > |
55 |
> > I'd like to see the answers to this one, but I have a feeling that |
56 |
> > everybody has a love/hate relationship with this. They either love it, |
57 |
> > or they hate it. I also tend to think that *many* people have an |
58 |
> > opinion on the Installer without ever even using it. As such, I don't |
59 |
> > think that we'd get any usable results out of this, but it'll still be |
60 |
> > fun to ask. |
61 |
> |
62 |
> I for one never used it so I can't really love or hate it but from |
63 |
> what people who have used it tells me to stay away from it because |
64 |
> I'll eventually hate it. |
65 |
|
66 |
Well, anybody who dislikes it because of bugs or a bad experience, I can |
67 |
completely understand. I was really speaking mostly of the people who |
68 |
dislike the *idea* of an Installer for Gentoo, and then go and bash it |
69 |
as much as they can without providing any real evidence or reasons, |
70 |
except for the old faithful "it's against the spirit of Gentoo" reason, |
71 |
which is a complete fallacy. Again, Gentoo is about empowering the |
72 |
users to make their own decisions. No, I won't say Gentoo is about |
73 |
choice, because that is *STUPID* in that it gives people an excuse to |
74 |
argue about even the biggest piece of junk being added to our tree or |
75 |
supported, as if we have to, to give them the "choice". Instead, I |
76 |
prefer the concept of empowering the user to make their own choices, |
77 |
where they can choose to add anything that they want in their personal |
78 |
overlay, as we have given them the tools to do so. Now, if a user wants |
79 |
to use an Installer and someone wants to write the code, who are you (or |
80 |
I) to say that they are in the wrong? After all, isn't it that idea of |
81 |
empowering the user *really* the spirit of Gentoo? |
82 |
|
83 |
I think so. |
84 |
|
85 |
> Thanks for the great feedback Chris Gianelloni |
86 |
|
87 |
You're totally welcome. Take what I've said here as my own opinion, of |
88 |
course. |
89 |
|
90 |
> Fernando |
91 |
-- |
92 |
Chris Gianelloni |
93 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
94 |
Games Developer |