1 |
On Friday 15 August 2003 14:00, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> but now ive got it ! lets finally use metadata :) |
3 |
> i propose we add a section, maybe call it <howto> or <postinstconfig> or |
4 |
> something similar, or maybe have a few considering there are a few steps to |
5 |
> take when properly using some packages ... plus we wouldnt have to worry |
6 |
> about logging said informative output with some kludge that portage |
7 |
> implements because the user missed the message as it flew by his screen in |
8 |
> a multi-merge process ... |
9 |
> we extend the use of '-h' in emerge ... |
10 |
|
11 |
This is a really good idea. Also, over rsync, it only gets updated if it needs |
12 |
to be, and the one-off download is going to be tiny. |
13 |
|
14 |
Lets see... say ~50 words per package, and about 4 chars per word, thats 200 |
15 |
bytes per package. We now have ~6000 packages (as of the last GWN), so thats |
16 |
1,200,000 bytes, or ~1.14 MB. That is a very manageable number. Also, I |
17 |
imagine that every metadata.xml won't be updated at the same time, so it will |
18 |
be a staggered download. |
19 |
|
20 |
The <howto> section could even include links to Gentoo (or just general) |
21 |
documentation! i.e. hardened-sources could point to the hardened gentoo |
22 |
project page. Perhaps even topics in the forum, or the mailing list, where |
23 |
users have documented useful info about the package. |
24 |
|
25 |
Off on a tangent here, perhaps all of our information distributed via rsync, |
26 |
could be bzipped? I'm not familiar with rsync, or if it's anything like cvs |
27 |
(i.e. unable to handle binaries the way we want), but we could definately |
28 |
reduce the download times over rsync (something i've noticed, especially for |
29 |
the first rsync done on a system). |
30 |
|
31 |
Well, better go before I get too far offtopic :o) |
32 |
|
33 |
Cheers, |
34 |
Chris. |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |