| 1 |
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:33:45 +0300 |
| 2 |
Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 14:45:51 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> > The problem isn't the constants, though. The problem is the |
| 6 |
> > resolution algorithm. There's not much point tweaking performance |
| 7 |
> > until the resolver is fixed to produce a correct answer... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Oh, this was discussed so many times already... There is NO single |
| 10 |
> correct solution to such problems. And some mathematically correct |
| 11 |
> solutions are impractical (e.g. half of the tree rebuild), so other |
| 12 |
> ones which are good enough are preferred. As long as imperfect |
| 13 |
> solution works fine, I'm ok with it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
From my point of view it would do much help if portage resolves USE |
| 16 |
dependencies automatically instead of telling the user to change USE |
| 17 |
flags manually (I am talking about bug #258371). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Robert |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Róbert Èeròanský |
| 24 |
E-mail: openhs@×××××××××.com |
| 25 |
Jabber: hs@××××××.sk |
Archives