Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:17:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_=VVoUGV6O=obypFgiE6npUSEe0xxkL7mZWGx0PB32D1g@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory? by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several |
| 4 | > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions |
| 5 | > according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting |
| 6 | > the rdepend on app-shells/zsh. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I'd go with this, since this is how we handle bash. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Second choice would be to make installing the files USE-conditional |
| 11 | (since zsh is less common), but I wouldn't ever add an RDEPEND for |
| 12 | zsh. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory? | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory? | Alex Brandt <alunduil@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory? | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |