Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 13:07:23
Message-Id: 9b085748-2971-dcf0-1b62-4bf867e4697e@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop by Pacho Ramos
1 On 08/07/2016 06:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
2 > El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 10:29 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
3 >> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
4 >>>
5 >>> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop
6 >>>
7 >>> Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but
8 >>> I
9 >>> am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now empty
10 >>>
11 >>>
12 >>>
13 >>
14 >> I think it makes sense to keep desktop environments in a logical
15 >> grouping. There isn't a need for an overarching control structure
16 >> right
17 >> now, but if there needs to be coordination of efforts, I think
18 >> keeping
19 >> it in its current structure allows that to happen more easily than if
20 >> we
21 >> didn't have all the DEs in a project together.
22 >>
23 >
24 > Well, in the past (when herds existed) that was handled by freedesktop-
25 > bugs project... but now it's different:
26 > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Freedesktop
27 >
28 > Anyway, the current desktop project won't either fulfill your
29 > suggestion as, instead of being a general alias for all the projects
30 > under it (like freedesktop-bugs herd was), it will simply end up with
31 > nobody listening as nobody is a member of it :/
32 >
33
34 Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that contains
35 all the subprojects, no?
36
37 --
38 NP-Hardass

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>