| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 5 |
> I hate to be the bearer of bad news |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Somehow, I doubt that... ;) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> but that's because you don't realize |
| 10 |
> how many devs are sitting back and giggling at this thread 8) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I didn't realize you got together with other devs for giggle fests! ;) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> You've pretty much hijacked this thread to rant and rave about QA; we're |
| 15 |
> already aware of QA problems, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And yet I see scarce few ideas on how to solve the problem. The only |
| 18 |
other person who seems to have any are Ciaran, and what is his solution? |
| 19 |
He's doing *code reviews* of ebuilds. *GASP* Imagine that! |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> the reason nobody is listening to you in |
| 22 |
> this thread is not that nobody cares, it's that your ideas (well.. I |
| 23 |
> guess I've mostly only seen one..) have not been practical or useful for |
| 24 |
> reasons already explained. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
The only reason I've seen, besides "I don't wanna" and "how dare you |
| 27 |
question my l33t code skills", is the manpower/time issue. But my work |
| 28 |
experience tells me that the sooner you find a bug, the easier/faster it |
| 29 |
is to squash. So although my little idea *will* take time up front, it |
| 30 |
has the /potential/ to save much more time later on. |
| 31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
iD8DBQFDCIAX2QTTR4CNEQARAuOlAKCH97nGjDuI4VJnhIqNqeqARK9P5gCbBi5w |
| 35 |
nsTXa8Du1uQvqnlQhqTUBNo= |
| 36 |
=GZAK |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives