| 1 |
El mar, 10-04-2012 a las 09:12 +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that |
| 4 |
> > profiles. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way (to |
| 7 |
> let "gtk" mean "wxwidgets") would seem frustrating to me. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> With "wxwidgets" enabled by default people will get the most likely |
| 10 |
> desired result (i.e. GUI) "out of the box", and setting USE="-wxwidgets" |
| 11 |
> will have desired effect. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Note that with USE="gtk" really meaning USE="wxwidgets", -wxwidgets |
| 14 |
> would have no effect on such a package, which is the potentially |
| 15 |
> surprising behavior I mentioned earlier. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions |
| 19 |
point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome profiles, ok with that |
| 20 |
solution? |
Archives