| 1 |
On Sonntag 23 Oktober 2011 15:34:30 Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> If you only wanted to remove these files, you are free to use |
| 4 |
> INSTALL_MASK locally instead of downgrading the quality of tree. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Do you have any idea how much time me, and aballier spent to make |
| 7 |
> cdparanoia's build system as clean as it is now? And then to coordinate |
| 8 |
> them with upstream xiph.org? |
| 9 |
> Then I see this... Not acceptable by any standards. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'd like to get my standards up to speed, so may I respectfully ask- what is, |
| 12 |
apart from link time, the Gentoo-user-visible difference between |
| 13 |
* removing the .a files in the ebuild |
| 14 |
* and not building them in the first place? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
(A clean build system is of course desirable, and it's great that you have |
| 17 |
been helping upstream with that. I just dont understand how this affects "the |
| 18 |
quality of the tree", compared to "the quality of upstream sources".) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
TIA, |
| 21 |
Andreas |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 27 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 28 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives