| 1 |
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 01:37 am, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 20 July 2005 02:43, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 3 |
> > And as I've mentioned before I'd like MORE reports of packages |
| 4 |
> > working well before they are moved to stable arch. Without those |
| 5 |
> > stable working reports I don't have any means to judge just how |
| 6 |
> > much testing has been done on a package, other than my own use of |
| 7 |
> > a package (and as such I do leave things longer than the 30 days, |
| 8 |
> > because I don't entirely trust them). |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> This sounds like a request for the QA team. I tend to stay away |
| 11 |
> from most ~arch packages simply because most of our systems are |
| 12 |
> live production servers, but I'd be happy to test-drive new ebuilds |
| 13 |
> of vpopmail if it would help get new versions into the stable tree |
| 14 |
> faster. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
maybe ... but i think more than just the QA team needs to brainstorm some sort |
| 17 |
of feedback system ... |
| 18 |
-mike |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives