| 1 |
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:19, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> Do you realize that this would amount to serious patches on kde. KDE |
| 3 |
> expects KDEDIR(S) to work the way it does currently. I know it is not |
| 4 |
> ideal, but neither is the FHS. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Well I think it *is* ideal the way we have it - that was one of the many |
| 7 |
things that attracted me to Gentoo in the first place. It's the most |
| 8 |
sensible way I've come across for organizing KDE/Qt and we should not |
| 9 |
even consider abandoning it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Peter |
| 13 |
======================================================================== |
| 14 |
Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.50-r11. kernel-2.6.8-gentoo-r4. |
| 15 |
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+. gcc(GCC): 3.4.2. |
| 16 |
KDE: 3.3.0. Qt: 3.3.3. |
| 17 |
======================================================================== |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives