Re: [gentoo-dev] sunrise, a temporary compromise

[Anders Hellgren]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Stuart Herbert wrote:

> On 6/23/06, Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o> wrote:
>>  I'm amazingly confused about why technical policy decisions (and even
>>  discussions about them) are being made by devrel in a devrel-specific
>>  channel. Could someone clear me up on this?
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>  Donnie
>
> Sorry, but I must second this, especially as discussions have also
> been continuing that (unlike Mike's discussion) actually included
> council members.
>
> I'm all for folks trying to help resolve the Sunrise issues, but I
> feel that it's not devrel's place to be deciding this particular
> policy issue, especially when the issue has already been referred to
> the council.
>
> Best regards,
> Stu
>
FWIW, there was almost an hour's worth of discussion before the start of 
the log KingTaco posted. As a bystander, my guess is that the discussion 
took place in the devrel channel because a complaint about the use of the 
bugzilla whiteboard by the sunrise folks was brought up in that channel. 
The compromise was made to defuse further escalation to a formal complaint 
to devrel.

/Anders
- -- 
Anders Hellgren (kallamej)
Gentoo Forums Administrator
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEm5a5FX025WX+RG4RAvVOAKCQICkWz0MTJ4snNN0mdNT1MF/aWQCgrtQ2
rL5SMgybISpQLn7Lh52UO8A=
=Y6ad
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list