1 |
Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
2 |
> Hi folks, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> |
5 |
> in light of some recent discussions where overlay maintainers found |
6 |
> that bug reports had been assigned "incorrectly" and thought it was apt |
7 |
> to inform the miscellaneous bug wranglers of the correct assignees, I |
8 |
> thought it would be a good idea to introduce a new list, akin to |
9 |
> metadata.xml and herds.xml, to resolve this issue once and for all. As |
10 |
> with herds and metadata, this overlays.xml should list a repository's |
11 |
> name, HOMEPAGE and the e-mail address(es) of its maintainers. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> In the absence of such information, a bug wrangler may assign the bug |
14 |
> report to someone who has contributed to the overlay in question, or to |
15 |
> anyone who might reasonably know whom to properly assign the bug report |
16 |
> to. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> In case assignment goes awry, and when the assignee is part of the team |
19 |
> of proper assignees, then the team or assignee should make sure |
20 |
> overlays.xml is updated to reflect the current maintainance status and |
21 |
> should add the remainder of the assignees themselves. Nothing else |
22 |
> needs to be done in this case - the next time a different bug wrangler |
23 |
> might be handling a bug report about that overlay, so CC'ing or pinging |
24 |
> (on IRC) doesn't make sense - updating overlays.xml would. If the |
25 |
> assignee is not part of the maintainer team of the overlay in question, |
26 |
> then the bug may be bounced back to bug-wranglers@g.o. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Please discuss. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Kind regards, |
32 |
> jer |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
So you are asking for the layman file to be updated properly or what? |
36 |
|
37 |
layman -i <overlay name> |
38 |
|
39 |
IMO, what would really benefit us is to have a site akin to |
40 |
http://gpo.zugaina.org/ on a Gentoo host to *find* packages that are in |
41 |
'official' overlays. |
42 |
|
43 |
-Jeremy |