| 1 |
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400 |
| 2 |
Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> It has been noted that certain projects do not communicate their |
| 5 |
> activities well. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Many projects provide documentation for things(java), provide status |
| 8 |
> updates on things(ppc), have bits in the gwn (x86,userrel,amd64), |
| 9 |
> Release releases (releng), or have active webpages (adopt-a-dev, |
| 10 |
> bugday) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> There are some projects that keep to themselves; AND these projects |
| 13 |
> concern other projects (are global, to an extent). This AND means I |
| 14 |
> can leave out things like arch teams, or smaller projects that don't |
| 15 |
> update often. This mail is not meant for things like that. So below |
| 16 |
> we have 3 large far-reaching projects. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Gentoo Quality Assurance Team |
| 19 |
> Gentoo Infrastructure Team |
| 20 |
> Gentoo Portage Team |
| 21 |
> Gentoo Foundation |
| 22 |
> Gentoo Council |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> All 5 of these projects are active. However all 5 have failed to |
| 25 |
> communicate what they are doing; leading to people asking multiple |
| 26 |
> times about an issue, people getting frustrated, people getting |
| 27 |
> outright pissed off and hostile. Today especially has been a bad day |
| 28 |
> for this. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
If this really concerns you then I have to ask why *you* didn't send |
| 31 |
status reports for the Portage Team in the past? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Marius |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 39 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives