Archives
Archives
| From: | mike <vapier@×××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] portage wanting to 'update' to lower version of installed package | ||
| Date: | Fri, 20 Sep 2002 21:54:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | 0ea701c2611a$71a33300$55f1d782@vapier | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] portage wanting to 'update' to lower version of installed package by Burton Samograd |
||
| 1 | if a new version was unmasked and later found to be |
| 2 | REALLY broken or a huge security hole or something, |
| 3 | then this makes sense. |
| 4 | the idea is that, if the package is masked, then its not |
| 5 | supposed to be on a normal system (its still being tested |
| 6 | and/or its known to be bad) |
| 7 | -mike |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ----- Original Message ----- |
| 10 | From: "Burton Samograd" <kruhft@×××××××××××××.org> |
| 11 | To: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
| 12 | Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 22:33 |
| 13 | Subject: [gentoo-dev] portage wanting to 'update' to lower version of |
| 14 | installed package |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] portage wanting to 'update' to lower version of installed package | Burton Samograd <kruhft@×××××××××××××.org> |