Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 18:13:45
Message-Id: 20090517121524.5a6f19e5@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated by "Piotr Jaroszyński"
1 On Sun, 17 May 2009 17:56:06 +0200
2 Piotr Jaroszyński <peper@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Hello,
5 >
6 > I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer.
7 >
8 > Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is:
9 >
10 > 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously)
11 > 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change
12 > 3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild and one-time extension change
13 >
14 > I can live with any of these if that's what it takes to move forward.
15
16 I'd like 2 if we could have multiple same-versioned ebuilds of different
17 EAPI. 3 is good enough for me.
18
19 --
20 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
21 treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
22 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>