Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:56:28
Message-Id: d77765540905170856wa882914ica3dc4698c03bc96@mail.gmail.com
1 Hello,
2
3 I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer.
4
5 Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is:
6
7 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously)
8 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change
9 3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild and one-time extension change
10
11 I can live with any of these if that's what it takes to move forward.
12
13 Imho, council should first vote on whether they see the problem
14 described in the GLEP as real (do we all agree on that at least?) and
15 then pick one of these solutions.
16
17 P.S. I know gentoo has other problems too, but it's the new and
18 innovative stuff that makes working on Gentoo fun.
19
20 [1] - http://dev.gentoo.org/~peper/glep-0055.html
21 (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0055.html once it synces)
22
23 --
24 Best Regards,
25 Piotr Jaroszyński

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated Thomas de Grenier de Latour <tom.gl@××××.fr>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated "Piotr Jaroszyński" <peper@g.o>