1 |
--On Wednesday, October 20, 2004 01:19:28 +0000 Tim Cera |
2 |
<timcera@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Philippe Trottier <tchiwam <at> gentoo.org> writes: |
5 |
>> Why not just having a directory / index and base the download / rsync |
6 |
>> on what is needed ? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I submitted a patch (a long time ago) that only rsynced the portage tree |
9 |
> for the installed ebuilds. Worked great. Would have to be extended to |
10 |
> fetch new ebuilds when USE variables or dependencies change. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44526 |
13 |
> |
14 |
> A really cool benefit would be that you could collect what people |
15 |
> installed from the rsync server logs. |
16 |
|
17 |
I'm not sure that I would call that a cool benefit. It seems to come close |
18 |
to an egregious violation of privacy. I know that there is no promise of |
19 |
confidentiality in the use of the portage rsync servers, but to actively |
20 |
and publicly start collecting data about who is using what seems to only |
21 |
invite more paranoia. |
22 |
|
23 |
Andy |
24 |
(JFMuggs) |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |