Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrew Fant <andrew.fant@×××××.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rsync speed and space taken
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:56:17
Message-Id: 124470000.1098482176@flux.usg.tufts.edu
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: rsync speed and space taken by Tim Cera
1 --On Wednesday, October 20, 2004 01:19:28 +0000 Tim Cera
2 <timcera@×××××××××.net> wrote:
3
4 > Philippe Trottier <tchiwam <at> gentoo.org> writes:
5 >> Why not just having a directory / index and base the download / rsync
6 >> on what is needed ?
7 >
8 > I submitted a patch (a long time ago) that only rsynced the portage tree
9 > for the installed ebuilds. Worked great. Would have to be extended to
10 > fetch new ebuilds when USE variables or dependencies change.
11 >
12 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44526
13 >
14 > A really cool benefit would be that you could collect what people
15 > installed from the rsync server logs.
16
17 I'm not sure that I would call that a cool benefit. It seems to come close
18 to an egregious violation of privacy. I know that there is no promise of
19 confidentiality in the use of the portage rsync servers, but to actively
20 and publicly start collecting data about who is using what seems to only
21 invite more paranoia.
22
23 Andy
24 (JFMuggs)
25
26
27
28 --
29 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rsync speed and space taken Luke-Jr <luke-jr@×××××××.org>
[gentoo-dev] Re: rsync speed and space taken Tim Cera <timcera@×××××××××.net>