1 |
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:18 PM, J. Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On 11 May 2015 15:59:40 CEST, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>>On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 9:37 AM, C Bergström <cbergstrom@×××××××××.com> |
4 |
>>wrote: |
5 |
>>> Sorry to shoot and run, but I think you're trying to tackle this |
6 |
>>> problem in the wrong way. The problem isn't to drop the mail. The |
7 |
>>> solution is to change email hosting providers. As a non-profit I |
8 |
>>> believe Google hosted apps would be an option (free). |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>>In general we try to stick to our social contract, and that means |
11 |
>>trying to avoid depending on proprietary technologies such as gmail. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>Now, I could see just using a FOSS-based IMAP/SMTP/POP provider, |
14 |
>>perhaps which allows things like forwarding and such, which allows us |
15 |
>>to have a copy of all our configuration and such in case we want to |
16 |
>>migrate. I'm not super-familiar with the wordpress.com model but |
17 |
>>something like that also seems reasonable - we leverage donations of |
18 |
>>hosting services but we aren't bound to anything proprietary and have |
19 |
>>the ability to migrate off. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>>I'd REALLY like to see a FOSS alternative to Gmail (a good one, that |
22 |
>>is), and ditto for Google docs (or whatever the latest branding for |
23 |
>>that is). There is nothing magical about cloud-based services any more |
24 |
>>than there is anything magical about letting somebody else host your |
25 |
>>website. The key is to ensure that the technologies are open so that |
26 |
>>you aren't bound to a single provider. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Rich, |
29 |
> |
30 |
> If you are thinking of a FOSS email provider. Maybe investigate Fastmail? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> They use postfix and cyrus. And they also handle a lot of the development of the latter. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Not sure if they would fit in with the rest, but I would trust them sooner then Google. |
35 |
|
36 |
Trust? LOL - If by trust you mean the government can man-in-the-middle |
37 |
attack them easily - then sure.. gmail always uses encryption.. does |
38 |
fastmail force that as well? Google has a much stronger means to push |
39 |
back short term and long term against government spying (snowden). |
40 |
fastmail would have to comply just the same and if you go back in |
41 |
history - you'll see other providers who didn' t comply and the only |
42 |
outcome was for them to go out of business... (happened once?) |
43 |
|
44 |
social contract shouldn't be a religious contract - It's not like I |
45 |
ever suggested we use something which isn't blessed by the pope. I |
46 |
guess I should just be quiet since everyone has their own religion... |