| 1 |
On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 21:47:11 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> So to summarize, instead of working together in order to follow a well- |
| 5 |
> established policy, |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You're reading it wrong. If its "established policy", dev manual must |
| 8 |
reflect that. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
If the dev-manual writes "should" in one place, and implies "must" in |
| 11 |
another for a same thing, then either: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
- The dev manual needs to be fixed |
| 14 |
- The policy is not as you suggest it is. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If the dev-manual is written correctly for the policy, then I expect he |
| 17 |
is saying he'll follow it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
But as per the way the dev manual is written, he arguably *is* |
| 20 |
following policy. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Stop taking the line of assuming he's trying to be belligerent. |
Archives