| 1 |
On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:41:28 +0200 |
| 2 |
Raúl Porcel <armin76@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Requesting ~arch keywords: Is a maintainer able to request ~arch |
| 5 |
> keywords, if the package is not a dependency of some other package |
| 6 |
> which is keyworded, and the maintainer doesn't have that arch? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yes. Last time I looked anyone could request a keyword. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> IMHO the packages should be keyworded if an arch team member or an |
| 11 |
> user of that arch requests it. Keywording something if an user of |
| 12 |
> said arch doesn't request it, is a waste of resources. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
How is making things available to your users a waste of resources? |
| 15 |
Anyways, if you're so far behind that you don't think you can manage |
| 16 |
keywording another package then just say so and deny the request. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What does this have to do with council? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
fonts, gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 22 |
mips, treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 23 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives