Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:09:05
Message-Id: 50071375.9090605@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge by Michael Mol
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 18/07/12 03:47 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
5 > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés
6 > <caneko@×××××.com> wrote:
7 >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
8 >> wrote:
9 >>
10 >> The real benefit is that it allows you to mount any partition, if
11 >> the tools to mount it live in the same partition.
12 >
13 > Certainly that's a benefit.
14 >
15
16 ...don't you mean, "if the tools to mount it live in the initramfs" ??
17
18 if the partition isn't mounted I don't see how the initramfs will
19 allow you to mount it using its own tools...
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
22
23 iF4EAREIAAYFAlAHE3QACgkQ2ugaI38ACPDQBwD9HOn8skOvLhpPYuqCnH1Nuh7e
24 zefAwVaHDQQsz9vKVeYA/1utNcF2ROdeiHlMfvte4TGH42lo+NOjdM1Ml0wpU9b/
25 =5AMo
26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>