| 1 |
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 01:20, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 2 |
> Personally, I would rather run into a package breaking in a revbump than |
| 3 |
> have it be missing keywords and not notified that it was behind. While yes |
| 4 |
> this stinks from a QA perspective, it also gets the problem addressed and |
| 5 |
> resolved quicker (usually) than running into it later on down the road. |
| 6 |
> It's also a lot easier wrt the overhead the package maintainers, arch |
| 7 |
> maintainers and infrastructure maintainers have to go through to |
| 8 |
> accomidate extra emails, bugs, etc if test requests had to be issued each |
| 9 |
> time a package got rev or version bumped in the portage tree. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
So for Sparc, I should just KEYWORD away (on non-critical packages) and |
| 12 |
hope nothing breaks? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
(Though I will be testing on my U2 once I get my hard drive in for it.) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 18 |
Release Engineering - Operations/QA Manager |
| 19 |
Games - Developer |
| 20 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives