| 1 |
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Nathaniel wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Regarding the etc-update issue, here are some of my thoughts. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> 1. etc-update should check modify dates and overwrite if not modified. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
I haven't followed this very closely because there's so much of it, but |
| 8 |
this one suddenly woke me up. Just because a file hasn't been modified |
| 9 |
doesn't imply that it's OK to change it, does it? Maybe it's fine the |
| 10 |
way it is, but won't be if it gets changed? Appologies if I'm rehashing |
| 11 |
something. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Regards, |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@××××××××.com> |
| 17 |
Phone: (703) 392-0303 |
| 18 |
Fax: (703) 392-0401 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives