| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 03:07:43PM +0200 or thereabouts, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 2 |
> And, right now I'm thinking about the developer end of things. It'd be more |
| 3 |
> comfortable for me to work with a single cvs tree and keywords. Fixing up the |
| 4 |
> rsync end is an implementation detail :-) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
For most cases, this would be exactly how things work -- you use the main |
| 7 |
CVS tree and just have an extra set of keywords to administer. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The only time you'll have to deal with a separate tree is for off-cycle |
| 10 |
updates, which are comprised of security updates and major bugfixes. IMO, |
| 11 |
this is infrequent enough to outweigh any potential inconveniences to the |
| 12 |
dev team. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
--kurt |
Archives